Well, another Budget has come and gone, bringing the usual mixture of political theatre, carefully trailed announcements and a great deal of head-scratching about what it all means once the red box has been put away.

I have watched enough Budgets from the mortgage coalface to know that the headline and the practical reality are not always the same thing. This time, though, there are some genuinely interesting measures for first-time buyers: a government-backed route to buying with a 2.5% deposit, changes to the way people can save for a home, and more money for social and affordable housing. There is also another tax increase for landlords, which may have consequences well beyond the people writing the tax returns.

There is plenty here to welcome, but housing policy should ultimately be judged by something rather less glamorous than the Chancellor’s applause lines. Does it help people find a secure home they can actually afford, whether they are buying, moving or renting? On that test, this Budget makes some useful progress, while leaving the biggest problem stubbornly in place.

A 2.5% deposit could make a real difference

The most eye-catching announcement is the new Your First Home scheme. Backed by £4.7 billion over five years, it is intended to help eligible first-time buyers purchase a qualifying new-build home in England.

The basic structure is straightforward enough. A buyer would provide a deposit of at least 2.5%, the government would provide an equity loan worth 20% of the purchase price, and a repayment mortgage from a participating lender would cover the rest. On a £300,000 home, that could mean finding £7,500 rather than the £15,000 normally needed for a 95% mortgage.

Now, £7,500 is hardly loose change. If you are already paying rent, bills, travel costs and the occasionally surprising price of a weekly shop, saving even that amount can be difficult. But halving the deposit hurdle is meaningful. Many sensible people are not locked out of homeownership because they could never manage a mortgage payment; they are locked out because the deposit feels like a mountain that keeps growing while they climb it.

That is why the scheme deserves a fair hearing. It will not remove the need for affordability and credit checks, and a smaller deposit will not magically allow someone to borrow any amount they like. What it may do is help people whose income can support a purchase but whose savings have not kept pace with house prices and rents.

There are important limits. The scheme is for eligible first-time buyers purchasing qualifying new-build homes in England. Household income is capped at £110,000 outside London and £140,000 in London, with local property price caps also applying. Pre-registration is expected by the end of December 2026, applications from February 2027 and the first purchases from April 2027. Participating lenders, developers and the full rules are still to be confirmed, so this is an announced scheme rather than something buyers can use today.

The government loan is not free money

Before anyone starts choosing kitchen units at the nearest development, it is worth looking at the other side of the arrangement. The equity loan is interest-free for five years. The published terms then show interest of 1.5% in year six and 3% from year seven. Those interest payments are separate from the mortgage and do not reduce the amount of the equity loan itself.

The amount eventually repaid is also linked to the value of the home. If a £60,000 equity loan originally represented 20% of a £300,000 property and that property later rose in value to £320,000, the government’s 20% share would be worth £64,000. If the value fell to £280,000, the share would normally fall to £56,000. In other words, the government shares in both the rise and the fall.

That does not make the scheme a bad deal. For some buyers it could be an excellent route into a home that would otherwise remain out of reach. It does mean the right question is not simply, ‘How little deposit do I need?’ Buyers also need to understand what their mortgage, equity-loan interest and repayment options could look like five, ten or fifteen years later, including what happens when they want to remortgage or move.

This is exactly where proper mortgage and legal advice matters. Getting the keys is the exciting part, quite rightly, but the plan still needs to work after the photographs and the first takeaway on the floor.

Some welcome common sense for savers

There was better news for savers too. The government has dropped the planned reduction in the cash ISA limit, which will remain at £20,000. I am pleased about that. We spend a great deal of time telling people to save, build resilience and prepare for the future, so making cash saving less attractive always felt like an odd note to play.

The Lifetime ISA rules are also changing. From 29 October 2026, a first-time buyer purchasing above the existing £450,000 property limit, while otherwise meeting the qualifying rules, will face a 20% withdrawal charge rather than 25%. In practical terms, that is designed to remove the government bonus without also taking a slice of the saver’s own original contribution.

That is a sensible correction, particularly in London and parts of the South East, where £450,000 does not always buy the palatial residence the number may suggest. The government also plans a new First Time Buyer ISA from April 2029 for new savers, while existing Lifetime ISAs can continue. The proposed account would offer a 25% government bonus, allow annual contributions of up to £4,000 and provide a maximum bonus of £20,000 for a qualifying first-home purchase.

I welcome anything that helps people build a deposit, although the £450,000 purchase cap still deserves scrutiny. A fixed limit becomes less generous over time if prices move and the threshold does not.

Will the Budget bring mortgage rates down

This is the question people understandably ask around every Budget. The honest answer is that one speech does not determine mortgage pricing. Lenders consider inflation, market expectations for future interest rates, swap rates, their own funding costs and the level of competition for business.

Bank Rate is currently 3.75%, following the Bank of England’s decision on 17 September, with the next decision due on 5 November. Inflationary pressures have not disappeared, so I would be wary of confident promises that mortgage rates are about to tumble. A calm initial market reaction is preferable to the alternative, but it is not a crystal ball.

What matters is not becoming so determined to time the market perfectly that you never make a decision at all. I have spoken to plenty of people who delayed buying, moving or remortgaging because they were certain rates were about to fall sharply. Sometimes they were right and sometimes they were not. Nobody gets a season ticket to the future.

If you are buying, the key questions are whether the numbers work for you now, whether the repayments remain comfortable under reasonable stress and whether the property suits your plans. If your mortgage deal is ending, review your options early. You may be able to reserve something and change course later if a better option becomes available, depending on the lender and timing. Sensible preparation usually beats last-minute hope.

Landlords face another squeeze and tenants may feel it too

From April 2027, separate property income tax rates of 24%, 44% and 49% are due to apply to affected individual landlords in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Landlords are not always the most popular cast members in the housing debate, and poor practice should certainly be challenged, but the private rented sector does not exist in a sealed box.

When landlords face higher costs, some will absorb them, some may increase rents where the market allows, and others may decide that letting property no longer works for them. That does not mean every tax rise feeds directly into rent, and tenants’ ability to pay still matters, but it adds pressure to a market already short of homes in many areas.

There is an awkward circularity here. If rents rise, first-time buyers may find it even harder to save, including for the smaller deposit offered by Your First Home. A healthy housing market needs responsible landlords and greater opportunities for homeownership. Helping one group should not require pretending the other does not matter.

Demand side help still needs homes to buy

This brings us to the central Home Truth. Britain still does not build enough of the right homes, in the right places, at prices people can manage.

The Budget adds £1.5 billion to the Social and Affordable Homes Programme, which the government says will support around 10,000 additional homes. That is welcome. The Your First Home scheme is expected to help around 70,000 households and support an estimated 20,000 new homes. Those are meaningful numbers for the people involved, but they also illustrate the scale of the wider challenge.

Successive governments have tried deposit support, equity loans, mortgage guarantees and tax incentives. Some schemes have helped thousands of buyers, and we should not dismiss that. Yet if more purchasing power is chasing too few suitable homes, policy risks treating the symptom while the underlying shortage carries on.

We need planning reform that works in practice, the infrastructure that allows new communities to function, and a system in which smaller builders can compete alongside the large developers. Above all, we need a long-term housing strategy that survives longer than the average housing minister’s tenure.

Housing affects financial security, relationships, work, family plans and that basic human need for somewhere stable to call home. It is too important to be managed as a series of disconnected Budget surprises.

So was this a good Budget for homebuyers

On balance, there are positive measures here. Your First Home could make a real difference to buyers who can support a mortgage but cannot bridge the deposit gap. The ISA changes are sensible, and the Budget has not created unnecessary turmoil in mortgage markets.

The scheme’s success will depend on lender and developer participation, the availability and pricing of suitable new-build homes, and whether buyers understand the long-term equity-loan commitment. Helping more people buy is something I wholeheartedly support, but it cannot replace the larger job of increasing housing supply and maintaining a functioning rental market.

For anyone thinking about buying, moving or remortgaging, the practical message is simple. Do not assume a headline means you qualify, but do not rule yourself out before exploring the detail either. Understand your budget, look at the full cost rather than the deposit alone, and take advice early enough to make decisions without being rushed.

Monty’s Home Truth

Owning a home is never only about bricks, mortar or finding the lowest possible interest rate. For many people it means security, independence and the freedom to put down roots. That is why measures that widen access deserve support, particularly for buyers who do not have family wealth behind them.

Budget 2026 moves a few pieces in the right direction. It makes the deposit challenge easier for some buyers, improves the position for certain Lifetime ISA savers and adds money for affordable housing. But it does not remove the need for a bigger, steadier housing plan.

We should make it easier to save, keep responsible mortgage borrowing accessible, support a professional rental sector and, above all, build more of the homes people actually need. Behind every housing statistic is a person or family trying to find somewhere affordable and secure.

That is the test housing policy must ultimately pass.

Important information

Your home may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage.

There may be a fee for mortgage advice. The actual amount you pay will depend on your circumstances. The fee is up to 1% but a typical fee is 0.3% of the amount borrowed.